IB English Paper 1/2 Grading Workflow for Teachers

Paper 1 and Paper 2 both rely on IB criteria, but the task focus differs. Paper 1 emphasizes analysis of an unseen text, while Paper 2 asks for comparative analysis of works studied in class.

A consistent workflow keeps grading fair, fast, and aligned with the assessment criteria.

Paper 1 focus

• Understanding and interpretation: How well the student grasps the text.
• Analysis of authorial choices: Techniques, effects, and audience impact.
• Organization: Coherent structure and paragraphing.
• Language use: Academic tone, clarity, and control.

Paper 2 focus

• Comparative argument: Clear thesis connecting two works.
• Use of evidence: Relevant textual support and analysis.
• Insight into authorial choices: Linking technique to meaning.
• Structured comparisons: Paragraphs that compare, not just summarize.

Step-by-step grading workflow

1. Skim to find the thesis and overall argument line.
2. Mark one strong and one weak example of analysis.
3. Score against the criteria while annotating evidence.
4. Write 2-3 revision priorities tied to the rubric.
5. Finish with one positive note plus a clear next step.

Reusable feedback stems

• "Strengthen your analysis by explaining how the authorial choice shapes meaning."
• "Your comparison needs a clearer thesis that links both works."
• "Add topic sentences that guide the reader through each comparison."
• "Clarify the evidence by connecting quotes directly to your argument."

Next steps

Use the IB English Paper Grader for criterion-level scoring and the IB Rubric Generator to share expectations before practice exams.